Martin and I developed a visual language with which to assist our stakeholders to communicate narratives. Loosly following “ The Thing From The Future”, Extrapolation Factory by Stuart Candy and Jeff Watson, we used the system of categorization to identify key aspects of experience that could be interpreted both specifically to the individual and on a broad scale of social experiences.
In collaboration with our colleagues and advisors, we held a workshop that included activists, writers, and experts in the fields of the criminal justice system, incarceration, mental health issues, and social equality. As a group, we sought a transdisciplinary collaboration to bring non-designers and designers together to extrapolate knowledge and patterns surrounding issues in the criminal justice system, and collaborate in interpreting that information.
Our participating storytellers - Craig Hartl, Daliah Heller, D. Watkins and Fury Young - used the narrative toolkit to share experiences they’ve had with incarceration, particularly with community relationships with formerly incarcerated people. We took it a step further, asking each other what could help a community to feel more comfortable accepting a formerly incarcerated person, considering the institutional hurdles that stigmatize FIP?
The outcome was four destinct visualizations of data; four stories that communicated deeply with one image.
Navigating social spaces before, during, and after incarceration ::
D. Watkins, Writer
Utopian experience vs. current, restrictive experience::
Dr. Daliah Heller, Clinical Professor at CUNY School of Public Health
“What if everyone had to go to prison, even just for a week. What would that do?” :: Fury Young, Musician + Criminal Justice Reform Activist
What if smaller, alternative communities grow to collaboratively take over the status quo, or mainstream society?:: Craig Hartl, Student + Social Activist
As we continued to talk, each person took turns visualizing our ideas. We interpreted ideal social conditions (utopia). We debated what it means to be a member of an outsider group, how exclusive communities subsist, and what their point of views could potentially be. We considered definitions of exclusivity, access, boundaries and barriers. We discussed at length the conditions that lead to re-entry (as one participant put it, everything pre-re-entry is essential to understanding the experience of re-entry). We discussed what it meant to be human, and that on a very basic level we all want the same things, no matter what community we belong to or exist outside of. We also asked -- is it possible to let go of attempting to connect to a social group that maybe does not accept a formerly incarcerated person, and to subvert the system by creating a new one?
Inspired by the workshop, we wondered how we could encourage empathy in communities that do not fully understand the difficulties of re-entry? How do we encourage a community inspired discussion?